Warning: call_user_func_array() [function.call-user-func-array]: First argument is expected to be a valid callback, '' was given in /home/content/50/8762750/html/wp-includes/class-wp-hook.php on line 298

GLOBAL MARKETS LOOK GOOD TO US

GLOBAL MARKETS LOOK GOOD TO US

WE HAVE BEEN ASKED OVER AND OVER ABOUT THE RISKS IN CHINA…AND OUR ANSWER IS THE SAME: WE EXPECT CHINA TO REMAIN STRONG!

The press always carries questions about China’s perceived risk, thus they are on peoples’ minds. Though we have addressed many of these questions and concerns in previous letters, we are happy to explain our fundamental optimism about China.

We hear three main questions:

Question 1:
China has been an export driven country in the past, how can they make it without exporting as much?

Answer:
It’s an undeniable fact that exports account for a decreasing percentage of China’s GDP each year. China’s exports have fallen in the past year or two and the countries and sectors to which they export have changed as well. Their exports are primarily to non-Japan Asia, Japan, and Europe. The U.S. is no longer the primary export destination for China.

Conceiving of the Chinese economy as entirely dependent on exports is overly simplistic. The Chinese economy can be likened to a three legged stool in which exports, infrastructure building, and consumer spending all serve to support the economy.

It is worth noting that China’s imports come from commodity producing countries like; Australia, Brazil, Canada, Indonesia, Malaysia, and many others. To invest in China’s growth, we suggest investors buy stocks in countries that export to China.

Question 2:
How can China slow down real estate speculation without causing a collapse in the economy such as what was seen in the U.S. and Europe? Why are real estate prices rising so fast in the big cities?

Answer:
In most of the world, there are four major investment outlets: stocks, real estate, bonds, and commodities. By far, the largest securities markets in the world are in bonds. Bonds are conservative low-yielding investments and they consume a large amount of the capital of investors around the globe.

However, in China, bonds are not widely available. A Chinese investor has only two outlets for investment capital: stocks and real estate. As a result, a great deal of capital flows into stocks and real estate that would likely go into bonds, if they were available.

Consider how the U.S. bond markets works. There are several levels of bond investments. There are U.S. government bonds, which include government agencies that are state tax exempt, corporate bonds on which investors pay taxes, and finally, municipal bonds that are state and federal tax exempt.

Now, put yourself in the shoes of a Chinese investor. You have no option to buy municipal bonds, no option to buy government bonds in quantity, and most corporations do not sell corporate bonds. There is a very limited pool of investment choices for a wealthy person to store money and to protect their assets from inflation. He or she can buy stocks and real estate. More recently Chinese savers have been able to buy gold and silver bullion.

As massive wealth has been created by many enterprising Chinese, they are looking for a way to invest their surplus of cash. They prefer an investment which is close to home so they can keep and eye on it, and one from which they can perhaps get some income.

They buy apartments in their home areas. Since most wealthy Chinese live in the big cities like Shanghai, Beijing, etc., they typically buy their 2nd, 3rd, and 4th apartments in these cities to diversify their assets. These real estate purchases are driving prices higher; and prices do sometimes rise to unreasonable levels.

The significant difference between U.S. and European real estate investors and their Chinese counterparts is that the Chinese do not buy these apartments on high leverage. By law, Chinese investors must put down 50 percent of the purchase price in cash and pay higher interest rates when they borrow to buy a second apartment.

This keeps leverage low. Because leverage is low and because, in many smaller cities, there is a shortage of apartments, we do not see the overvaluation and sky-high prices of luxury apartments in the four or five big cities as a longer term problem. There is huge demand for reasonably priced apartments, and currently the only over-built area is high priced, high status apartments, which will have to be marked down to sell.

Though luxury apartment prices may need to fall, this will not create a long-term problem for the banks who have lent to build some of these overpriced apartments for three reasons:

Reason A) The apartments are not a huge percentage of the banks’ total loans.

Reason B) The banks increased their capital after the Chinese government criticized their over-lending in this area and demanded that they raise more capital. Contrast this with the U.S. and in Europe, where there was minimal government criticism and no government requirement to raise more capital. In fact, the governments of the U.S. and Europe encouraged and even subsidized a good part of the unwise lending in real estate, only after the collapse and bail out were banks forced to raise more capital.

Reason C) Real estate debt derivatives are not ubiquitous in China like they were in Europe and the U.S. It was clearly these real estate derivative debt instruments that caused much of the problem in the West.

In conclusion, bad real estate loans may become a problem in China, but it should be a well contained problem.

Question 3:
What about special investment vehicles set up by provinces for infrastructure building in their province? (These supported many kinds of infrastructure including apartments.)

Answer:
Remember when we mentioned that there are no municipal bonds in China? In other countries, municipalities and provinces borrow money from the public with general obligation [unsecured] or secured revenue bonds. China’s provinces are unique in that they borrow directly from banks and secure their loans with provincial property, therefore secured debt. In addition, they are limited in scope because they are from the banks, not from the more easily manipulated, less sophisticated investing public.

If the provinces do not pay their loans, the banks can repossess their property and sell it to recoup their losses. In addition, taxes are fairly low in China and provinces do not tax citizens and businesses as much as they do in much of the rest of the world. Therefore taxes can be raised by provinces to pay off these loans.

IN SUMMARY, WE DO NOT THINK CHINA WILL MELT DOWN IN THE NEAR FUTURE, AS SOME FEAR

We hope these answers explain satisfactorily to our readers why we remain essentially optimistic about China in the near future. This does not mean that problems will not arise, but we believe it may be in five or six years. We believe that investors selling today will watch Chinese stocks rise for years before a major problem arises in the Chinese economy. Investors who pull out of China today are, not unlike those investors who sold U.S. tech stocks in 1995…instead of 2000, leaving a lot of money on the table.

MEXICO: AN UNSTABLE SITUATION

In previous letters we have mentioned the deteriorating situation in Mexico and the likelihood that more immigrants will seek the safety of the United States in coming years. Currently, the crisis is escalating and it is high time that the Mexican government seek help from others to solve their drug and corruption problems. They are proving unable to cope with these problems without help.

The following Los Angeles Times article describes the current situation. The author leads the article by saying “Mexico drug gangs turn weapons on army in northern states this week, gunmen fought troops and sought to confine some to their bases by cutting off access and blocking roads. The aggression shows they are not afraid to challenge the army.”

MEXICO UNDER SIEGE
April 02, 2010
By Tracy Wilkinson

Reporting from Mexico City — Drug traffickers fighting to control northern Mexico have turned their guns and grenades on the Mexican army, authorities said, in an apparent escalation of warfare that played out across multiple cities in two border states.

In coordinated attacks, gunmen in armored cars and equipped with grenade launchers fought army troops this week and attempted to trap some of them in two military bases by cutting off access and blocking highways, a new tactic by Mexico’s organized criminals.

In taking such aggressive action, the traffickers have shown that they are not reluctant to challenge the army head-on and that they possess good intelligence on where the army is, how it moves and when it operates.

At least 18 alleged attackers were killed and one soldier wounded in the fighting that erupted Tuesday in half a dozen towns and cities in the states of Tamaulipas and Nuevo Leon, the army said, topping off one of the deadliest months yet in a drug war that has raged for nearly 3 1/2 years.

The U.S. Consulate in Monterrey issued a warning to Americans who might be traveling in northern Mexico for the Easter break, citing the sudden outbreaks of gun battles in Nuevo Leon and neighboring states.

Traffickers previously have fought with army patrols, but the attempt to blockade garrisons came after weeks of an intense, bloody power struggle between two rival organizations, the Gulf cartel and its erstwhile paramilitary allies, the Zetas, to control the region bordering South Texas.

Part of the strategy of Tuesday’s assaults may have been to prevent the army from patrolling, to give the drug gangs a freer hand in their fight against each other.

"This really speaks to the incredible organization and firepower that the drug-trafficking organizations have managed to muster," said Tony Payan, a border expert at the University of Texas at El Paso. "These are organizations that are flexible, supple and quick to react and adapt. They no doubt represent a challenge to the Mexican state."

To read full article please visit:
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/apr/02/world/la-fg-mexico-gunbattles2-2010apr02


THE FINANCIAL CRISIS REVISITED: STILL TRYING TO PIN IT ON SOMEBODY

This morning, Alan Greenspan testified before a governmental commission investigating the cause of the financial crisis. We do not want to spend a lot of time rehashing old topics, but we have said many times over the past few years (and readers can go back into our Commentary Archive to read more), the financial problems were created by…many parties. Therefore, we shouldn’t expect anyone to accept full responsibility. Greenspan, Congress, regulators, lenders, investment bankers, GSE’s, ratings agencies, investors, real estate agents, and borrowers all had a hand in causing a crisis that nearly brought down the banking system.

GLOBAL MARKETS LOOK GOOD TO US

Presently, we own stocks in Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia, China, Korea and Indonesia. We own oil stocks in Canada and the U.S., and international oil stocks that operate in Africa, Europe, and Asia, that trade in London and in Toronto. We continue to believe in gold, and stocks in export industries within developed countries. This morning gold is currently trading just below a technical resistance level on the charts. If it is successful breaking through resistance, it could quickly move up to its 2009 highs, above $1,200 per ounce. We also like technology, basic materials, transportation and a few banking stocks.
Thanks for listening.


These articles are for informational purposes only and are not intended to be a solicitation, offering or recommendation of any security.  Guild Investment Management does not represent that the securities, products, or services discussed in this web site are suitable or appropriate for all investors.   Any market analysis constitutes an opinion that may not be correct.  Readers must make their own independent investment decisions.

The information in this article is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to law or regulation, or which would subject Guild Investment Management to any registration requirement within such jurisdiction or country.

Any opinions expressed herein, are subject to change without notice.  In addition, there are many market, currency, economic, political, business, technological and other risks that are beyond our control.  We make reasonable efforts to provide accurate content in these articles; however, some content and some of the assumptions, formulas, algorithms and other data that impact the content may be inaccurate, outdated, or otherwise inappropriate.  In addition, we may have conflicts of interest with respect to any investments mentioned.  Our principals and our clients may hold positions in investments mentioned on the site or we may take positions contrary to investments mentioned.

Guild’s current and past market commentaries are protected by copyright.  Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act, you must not copy, frame, modify, transmit or distribute the market commentaries, without seeking the prior consent of Guild.